Delhi riots:
The government is responsible for the anti-Muslim riots in Delhi.
In the lower house of parliament, the opposition leader of the Congress, Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury, said, "If the government tried, the riots in Delhi would have been stopped. Holi festivities are over, but the Holi of Delhi's blood has not left us behind. '
He made the remarks during a Lok Sabha discussion on Wednesday about the recent violent incidents in the Indian capital, Delhi.
Adhir Babu said, "All Indians are concerned about the incident and everyone wants to know how it happened and what steps the government is taking to ensure that this national incident does not happen again."
He said, 'No one can win in violence. Only humanity is defeated in it. Some say that Hindus have died somewhere, Muslims have died somewhere. But in fact humanity has died. '
Adhir Chowdhury added, "Delhi government's violence would have been stopped if the government tried. It is the country's capital. We treat the police here as modern. There is no shortage of weapons. So why did this happen? How can this happen for three days at a time? The government has to respond to this. Where was Home Minister Amit Shah for three days? It is his duty to maintain law and order in Delhi. ”
The security adviser praised Ajit Doval, saying that as Ajit Doval took to the streets, the violence stopped. Where Ajit Doval can go, why can't Amit Shah go? Apart from the Home Minister, there are two Home Ministers, but nonetheless, Ajit Doval has gone to the violent areas. He is not responsible for the law and order of Delhi. ”
On the other hand, Trinamool senior MP Professor Saugat Roy said, “There is peace in Delhi when Ajit Doval is down the road. But why did not the Home Minister go there? He should resign. He should resign in the name of God. ”He also demanded a judicial inquiry into the Delhi violence.
Today, the BJP MP Meenakshi writes about the steps taken by Home Minister Amit Shah to prevent violence by trying to respond to the criticism of the opposition.
Many would not have been so injured if the army had deployed troops in a timely area.
The government is responsible for the anti-Muslim riots in Delhi.
In the lower house of parliament, the opposition leader of the Congress, Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury, said, "If the government tried, the riots in Delhi would have been stopped. Holi festivities are over, but the Holi of Delhi's blood has not left us behind. '
He made the remarks during a Lok Sabha discussion on Wednesday about the recent violent incidents in the Indian capital, Delhi.
Adhir Babu said, "All Indians are concerned about the incident and everyone wants to know how it happened and what steps the government is taking to ensure that this national incident does not happen again."
He said, 'No one can win in violence. Only humanity is defeated in it. Some say that Hindus have died somewhere, Muslims have died somewhere. But in fact humanity has died. '
Adhir Chowdhury added, "Delhi government's violence would have been stopped if the government tried. It is the country's capital. We treat the police here as modern. There is no shortage of weapons. So why did this happen? How can this happen for three days at a time? The government has to respond to this. Where was Home Minister Amit Shah for three days? It is his duty to maintain law and order in Delhi. ”
The security adviser praised Ajit Doval, saying that as Ajit Doval took to the streets, the violence stopped. Where Ajit Doval can go, why can't Amit Shah go? Apart from the Home Minister, there are two Home Ministers, but nonetheless, Ajit Doval has gone to the violent areas. He is not responsible for the law and order of Delhi. ”
On the other hand, Trinamool senior MP Professor Saugat Roy said, “There is peace in Delhi when Ajit Doval is down the road. But why did not the Home Minister go there? He should resign. He should resign in the name of God. ”He also demanded a judicial inquiry into the Delhi violence.
Today, the BJP MP Meenakshi writes about the steps taken by Home Minister Amit Shah to prevent violence by trying to respond to the criticism of the opposition.
Many would not have been so injured if the army had deployed troops in a timely area.
Comments