Skip to main content

In 1947, Muslims should be driven from India to Pakistan: Minister Giriraj Singh

India / Hate Comment




Indian Union minister and BJP firebrand leader Giriraj Singh has made controversial remarks that Muslims should have been sent to Pakistan in 1947. His comments came out in the media on Friday.


In a media interview in Bihar's Purnia, Giriraj Singh said, "If all the Muslims were sent to Pakistan in 1947 and the Hindus were brought to this country, we would not have faced this situation today."


"It is time to make a commitment to the caste," he said. Prior to 1947, Muhammad Ali Jinnah had come forward for a Muslim nation. Our ancestors made a big mistake. The price we have to pay. If Indians do not find refuge in this country, where will they go? ”A video related to Giriraj Singh has become virtually viral in the media.



Assistant Professor Abdul Matin

In this regard, Abdul Matin, assistant professor of international relations at the traditional Jadavpur University, Kolkata, West Bengal, India, said on Friday, "This is not a personal comment by Giriraj Singh. This is an ideological statement from them. It is not fair to expect too much from them. That's why they do it naturally. The question now is that they took the oath of the constitution when they came to Parliament as MPs. Then I swore that I would follow the constitution rules. Every citizen read the message of equality in the constitution saying that it is equal. Then tell her that I didn't read it. I made that mistake. In fact, they are on both sides. On the one hand, when the government runs in the parliament, he swears the constitution and on the streets he refers to the people. It should be understood by the people that they take such a narrow road. '


Union Minister Giriraj Singh has recently called women who are in a position to oppose the Revised Citizenship Act (CAA) in Shaheenbagh, Delhi, India.


He said, "Shaheenbag has become not just a movement, but a suicide bomber. Conspiracy is being plotted against the country in the country's capital. ”His new controversial remarks have not stirred up his controversial remarks, which has triggered a stir in the political arena.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Most of Babri Mosque Defenders Refuse SWB Propose

Swift denials followed the claim that the UP Sunni Central Wakf Board had withdrawn the claim on the Ayodhya land however a part of intrigue adorned  within the air with chairman Zufar Ahmad Farooqui remaining incommunicative. The counsel for the Sunni Central Waqf Board Associate in Nursingd 2 plaintiffs have same a “false rumour” was being unfold that it had two-handed an legal document to an advocate to withdraw its claim on a pair of.77 acres of controversial land in Ayodhya “in the interest of Hindu-Muslim unity”. Some news channels reportable that the board had submitted the letter through advocate Sriram Panchu. The advocate was picked by the Supreme Court as a member of a mediation panel to bring all sides in Ram the Janmabhoomi-Babri place of worship case to the negotiation table. However, the 3 main claimants — the Sunni Central Waqf spikenard, the Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lala Virajman — had same they'd settle for the decision of the Supreme Court. Syed ...

Is friendship with Russia the reason for Imran's downfall?

  In Parliament, 184 votes were cast in favor of the motion of no-confidence by the MPs representing the parties opposed to the Imran Khan-led government and 110 votes were cast against it.  162 votes were enough to enforce the no-confidence motion .  Imran Khan has been claiming that a conspiracy to oust him was hatched by the White House because of his independent foreign policy.  According to him, he was the victim of an unwritten agreement between the opposition and the US government.  In the eyes of the US government and some of its regional allies, Imran Khan became a disobedient government contrary to their expectations!  Washington was outraged when Imran turned down offers to allow US forces to use some of Pakistan's military bases, and visited Russia after the start of the Ukraine war.  No other government has dared to adopt the kind of independent policy that Imran has adopted, especially closer to China and Russia.  Since taking office...

More US sanctions on Iran and reactions

More US sanctions  on Iran and reactions T he US government has imposed new sanctions on an Iranian organization and nine individuals as part of its anti-Iran policy. Washington says, "The sanctions were imposed on Iran's top leader Ayatollah Ujma Khamenei to be appointed or to act on his behalf." On Monday, the US Department of State's Foreign Asset Control Department issued a press release and issued the ban. The sanctions were imposed on the 40th anniversary of the capture of the former US embassy in Iran known as the Ace of Spies. The sanctions were imposed on Iran's army chief, Major General Mohammad Bakeri, and Ibrahim Raisi, the head of the judiciary, appointed by Iran's top leader. The United States also imposed sanctions on former Defense Minister and commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Force Brigadier General Hossein Dehkan and Major General Golam Ali Rashid, head of the IRGC's Khatamul Ambiya headquarters. In addition, s...