Skip to main content

Opinion

Why Modi Goverment scared from scholars ?


Fact and Reaction 


Bihar Police on Sunday clarified that the case against 49 individuals who wrote a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi against mob lynchings in the country were filed on the basis of a court order, NDTV reported. State Police chief Guptesvar Pandey’s remarks came a day after Union minister Prakash Javadekar said that case against the signatories had not been filed by the central government.

“We have taken cognizance of this matter and whatever FIR was filed, it was on the local CJM [Chief Judicial Magistrate] court’s order,” Pandey said. “I can assure you that an investigation will be done as per the order, and there’s no cause of worry or panic. In view of the sensitivity of the matter, we would like to finish the investigation sooner rather than later.” Police had slapped sedition charges on the 49 individuals on Friday after a lawyer from Bihar filed a complaint against them.

The 49 personalities included historian Ramchandra Guha, actor Konkana Sen Sharma, and filmmakers Mani Ratnam and Aparna Sen, among others. In their letter to Modi in July the public figures claimed that the “Jai Shri Ram” slogan had become a “provocative war cry” and the reason for a number of lynchings. Now, they have been accused of tarnishing “the image of the country”, and undermining “the impressive performance of the prime minister” besides “supporting secessionist tendencies”.

Meanwhile, political parties and film organisations on Sunday demanded that the authorities withdraw the sedition case against the individuals. The Communist Party of India (Marxist) and the Kerala State Chalachitra Academy along with the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, the Congress and many others condemned the move, PTI reported.

The CPI(M) criticised the Centre and said the decision to slap sedition charges showed the “growing authoritarianism” in the country. The Kerala Chalachitra Academy, on the other hand, described it as “blatant violation” of freedom of expression.
,


Analysis 
During the Modi era, an intolerance was created in the whole country. There is an increased tendency for violance
among people. Hate and vengeance have increased on the basis of caste and religion. The backdrop for all this is political drunkenness. This is the case with the hateful comments of BJP MLAs and MPs. As a result, incidents like murder, harassment and humiliation of women are taking place. But the Modi government is absolutely silent on this. The government did not take any action to stop these crimes. The Supreme Court has to worry about the crime. In this situation, the scholars of India have opened their mouths. But it seems to be treason to the Modi government. Therefore, a case has been filed against them. but why? Are they really a traitor? Nor does the ruler remember the role of philosophers in the French Revolution! For what reason does the Modi government want to shut down the scholars?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Most of Babri Mosque Defenders Refuse SWB Propose

Swift denials followed the claim that the UP Sunni Central Wakf Board had withdrawn the claim on the Ayodhya land however a part of intrigue adorned  within the air with chairman Zufar Ahmad Farooqui remaining incommunicative. The counsel for the Sunni Central Waqf Board Associate in Nursingd 2 plaintiffs have same a “false rumour” was being unfold that it had two-handed an legal document to an advocate to withdraw its claim on a pair of.77 acres of controversial land in Ayodhya “in the interest of Hindu-Muslim unity”. Some news channels reportable that the board had submitted the letter through advocate Sriram Panchu. The advocate was picked by the Supreme Court as a member of a mediation panel to bring all sides in Ram the Janmabhoomi-Babri place of worship case to the negotiation table. However, the 3 main claimants — the Sunni Central Waqf spikenard, the Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lala Virajman — had same they'd settle for the decision of the Supreme Court. Syed ...

Is friendship with Russia the reason for Imran's downfall?

  In Parliament, 184 votes were cast in favor of the motion of no-confidence by the MPs representing the parties opposed to the Imran Khan-led government and 110 votes were cast against it.  162 votes were enough to enforce the no-confidence motion .  Imran Khan has been claiming that a conspiracy to oust him was hatched by the White House because of his independent foreign policy.  According to him, he was the victim of an unwritten agreement between the opposition and the US government.  In the eyes of the US government and some of its regional allies, Imran Khan became a disobedient government contrary to their expectations!  Washington was outraged when Imran turned down offers to allow US forces to use some of Pakistan's military bases, and visited Russia after the start of the Ukraine war.  No other government has dared to adopt the kind of independent policy that Imran has adopted, especially closer to China and Russia.  Since taking office...

More US sanctions on Iran and reactions

More US sanctions  on Iran and reactions T he US government has imposed new sanctions on an Iranian organization and nine individuals as part of its anti-Iran policy. Washington says, "The sanctions were imposed on Iran's top leader Ayatollah Ujma Khamenei to be appointed or to act on his behalf." On Monday, the US Department of State's Foreign Asset Control Department issued a press release and issued the ban. The sanctions were imposed on the 40th anniversary of the capture of the former US embassy in Iran known as the Ace of Spies. The sanctions were imposed on Iran's army chief, Major General Mohammad Bakeri, and Ibrahim Raisi, the head of the judiciary, appointed by Iran's top leader. The United States also imposed sanctions on former Defense Minister and commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Force Brigadier General Hossein Dehkan and Major General Golam Ali Rashid, head of the IRGC's Khatamul Ambiya headquarters. In addition, s...