Skip to main content

The European Parliament opposes Trump's 'Deal of the Century'

The European Parliament opposes Trump's 'Deal of the Century'



A majority of members of the European Parliament have criticized US President Donald Trump's alleged Middle East peace plan 'Deal of the Century', calling it a violation of international law.


At the European Parliament session on Tuesday, the alleged peace plan was discussed. Members of the European Parliament say that the peace plan devised by the US administration goes to Israel and conflicts with international law. European Parliamentarians explicitly commented on the peace plan as a prejudice for Israel.


Katy Pirie, a member of the European Union elected from Holland, said the US plan was one-sided, illegal and involved international incitement. Trump's peace plan essentially legitimizes Israeli illegal settlement on the West Bank of Palestine and attempts to link the West Bank to Israel.



Donald Trump and Netanyahu are showcasing the series of the Deal of the Century

Katy Pirie emphasized that the plan presented by US President Donald Trump, called the Deal of the Century, was essentially a system of crossing the electoral line of the two right-wing leaders. He called the peace plan a disappointing plan. He refers to US President Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu, the warlord Prime Minister of Zionist Israel, as the two most right-wing leaders.


Manu Pineda, a member of the European Parliament elected from Spain, similarly commented on Trump's plan as the best fraud of the century.


At the session, Belgian Member Hilday Votmans urged the European Union to intervene in this matter as a trusted intermediary, and urged European Union foreign policy chief Joseph Borel to take the initiative for a peace conference.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is friendship with Russia the reason for Imran's downfall?

  In Parliament, 184 votes were cast in favor of the motion of no-confidence by the MPs representing the parties opposed to the Imran Khan-led government and 110 votes were cast against it.  162 votes were enough to enforce the no-confidence motion .  Imran Khan has been claiming that a conspiracy to oust him was hatched by the White House because of his independent foreign policy.  According to him, he was the victim of an unwritten agreement between the opposition and the US government.  In the eyes of the US government and some of its regional allies, Imran Khan became a disobedient government contrary to their expectations!  Washington was outraged when Imran turned down offers to allow US forces to use some of Pakistan's military bases, and visited Russia after the start of the Ukraine war.  No other government has dared to adopt the kind of independent policy that Imran has adopted, especially closer to China and Russia.  Since taking office...

Most of Babri Mosque Defenders Refuse SWB Propose

Swift denials followed the claim that the UP Sunni Central Wakf Board had withdrawn the claim on the Ayodhya land however a part of intrigue adorned  within the air with chairman Zufar Ahmad Farooqui remaining incommunicative. The counsel for the Sunni Central Waqf Board Associate in Nursingd 2 plaintiffs have same a “false rumour” was being unfold that it had two-handed an legal document to an advocate to withdraw its claim on a pair of.77 acres of controversial land in Ayodhya “in the interest of Hindu-Muslim unity”. Some news channels reportable that the board had submitted the letter through advocate Sriram Panchu. The advocate was picked by the Supreme Court as a member of a mediation panel to bring all sides in Ram the Janmabhoomi-Babri place of worship case to the negotiation table. However, the 3 main claimants — the Sunni Central Waqf spikenard, the Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lala Virajman — had same they'd settle for the decision of the Supreme Court. Syed ...

What doing now Muslim Communities?

Mohammad Ghori Shah  #What Iran has done so far against Israel is heroic, on the other hand, the behavior of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Turkey is cowardly. The current time is very important and dangerous. If Muslim countries cannot unite at this time, they will be humiliated by Israel and America one after another. On the other hand, if they support Iran simultaneously, the roar of Israel and America will be erased from history forever. Not only that, if the anti-imperialist forces can also unite at this time, the chapter of history is bound to change in the same way. Everything is just a possibility. However, the behavior of Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey has disappointed ordinary Muslims.