Skip to main content

Opponents criticized Trump's visit to India

India / US:




The main opposition Congress has questioned the spending of large sums on US President Donald Trump's proposed visit to India.


On Saturday, Congress Secretary General Priyanka Gandhi said, “The arrival of President Trump is spending Tk 1 million. But this money is being spent through a association. The members of the association do not know that they are members. What countrymen do not have the right to know how much money a ministry has given to that association? What is the government trying to hide behind the association? '


Donald Trump arrives in India on February 24 for a two-day visit to India. They are scheduled to visit Ahmedabad, Agra and New Delhi.


Congress wants to know who is the official officer of the Citizen Greetings Association? When was the company created? Where did they get the huge money to organize the event? The senior leader of the party and former Union Minister Anand Sharma alleged that the central and state governments have taken refuge in pseudonymity because of the government's expenditure as private. He alleged that the opposition MPs and MLAs in Gujarat were not invited to the event. Congressional speech, fancy congratulations are a good thing. But national interests should be given priority. What should be achieved in India, that aspect should be confirmed.



Congress leader Anand Sharma said, "The Indian government has demanded that all management work be done by the 'Citizen Greetings Association'. So is US President Donald Trump coming to India at the invitation of this association? When was that association formed, when was it registered? Where did this money come from? The reality is that all the money belongs to the Government of India and Gujarat. ”


All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (MIM) chief barrister Asaduddin YC MP has criticized India's foreign policy, saying, "We are wrong to think of America as a friend. Tell us what your foreign policy is. Modi and Trump have embraced many times but nothing has been found. '

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is friendship with Russia the reason for Imran's downfall?

  In Parliament, 184 votes were cast in favor of the motion of no-confidence by the MPs representing the parties opposed to the Imran Khan-led government and 110 votes were cast against it.  162 votes were enough to enforce the no-confidence motion .  Imran Khan has been claiming that a conspiracy to oust him was hatched by the White House because of his independent foreign policy.  According to him, he was the victim of an unwritten agreement between the opposition and the US government.  In the eyes of the US government and some of its regional allies, Imran Khan became a disobedient government contrary to their expectations!  Washington was outraged when Imran turned down offers to allow US forces to use some of Pakistan's military bases, and visited Russia after the start of the Ukraine war.  No other government has dared to adopt the kind of independent policy that Imran has adopted, especially closer to China and Russia.  Since taking office...

Most of Babri Mosque Defenders Refuse SWB Propose

Swift denials followed the claim that the UP Sunni Central Wakf Board had withdrawn the claim on the Ayodhya land however a part of intrigue adorned  within the air with chairman Zufar Ahmad Farooqui remaining incommunicative. The counsel for the Sunni Central Waqf Board Associate in Nursingd 2 plaintiffs have same a “false rumour” was being unfold that it had two-handed an legal document to an advocate to withdraw its claim on a pair of.77 acres of controversial land in Ayodhya “in the interest of Hindu-Muslim unity”. Some news channels reportable that the board had submitted the letter through advocate Sriram Panchu. The advocate was picked by the Supreme Court as a member of a mediation panel to bring all sides in Ram the Janmabhoomi-Babri place of worship case to the negotiation table. However, the 3 main claimants — the Sunni Central Waqf spikenard, the Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lala Virajman — had same they'd settle for the decision of the Supreme Court. Syed ...

More US sanctions on Iran and reactions

More US sanctions  on Iran and reactions T he US government has imposed new sanctions on an Iranian organization and nine individuals as part of its anti-Iran policy. Washington says, "The sanctions were imposed on Iran's top leader Ayatollah Ujma Khamenei to be appointed or to act on his behalf." On Monday, the US Department of State's Foreign Asset Control Department issued a press release and issued the ban. The sanctions were imposed on the 40th anniversary of the capture of the former US embassy in Iran known as the Ace of Spies. The sanctions were imposed on Iran's army chief, Major General Mohammad Bakeri, and Ibrahim Raisi, the head of the judiciary, appointed by Iran's top leader. The United States also imposed sanctions on former Defense Minister and commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Force Brigadier General Hossein Dehkan and Major General Golam Ali Rashid, head of the IRGC's Khatamul Ambiya headquarters. In addition, s...